I found Guy de Maupassant’s short
story, “The Necklace” very intriguing. This story was striking to me because I
found it relatable and I strongly connected to the main character Mathilde
Loisel. The ending of the story was the most surprising to me because I didn’t
expect the necklace to be costume jewelry. I also learned a lot through the
underlying themes about the superficiality of our society today.
Throughout the story, I assumed
that Mathilde’s necklace that she borrowed from Madame Forestier was authentic.
I was caught off guard when I found out the necklace was costume jewelry. I
believe this has a lot to say about how society is materialistic and finds
happiness only in shallow manners. I feel this relates significantly to the
world we live in today because many people value items rather than personal
relationships. After reading this story, I felt that I learned a lot about
myself as well as others. Mathilde learned that the real value of life isn’t
all about ones socio-economic status but should be focused on family and
internal happiness.
During the story, I felt a lot of
anger towards Mathilde because she took for granted what she had and was only
centered on making herself appear better to others. The focus that she held on
her outward appearance made me frustrated because it had a full effect on her
husband, Monsieur Loisel. Mr. Loisel went out of his way to make Mathilde happy
and it seemed like she was never satisfied. I felt a lot of sympathy towards
Mr. Loisel because he was trying to fulfill her needs for high culture, but
these needs were unattainable at their level of income.
This story impacted me as a reader
because it taught me to never jump to conclusions before I finish the story
entirely. I automatically assumed that the jewelry was real, which was
obviously incorrect, meaning that a lot can change towards the end. I enjoyed
the style of writing that the author used throughout his story. I also thought
that Guy de Maupassant used a spontaneous writing technique of adding a twist
at the end. This twist at the end of the story changed the meaning and kept me
thinking even after the story was over. By the end of the story, I felt that I
learned a lot about myself and the world around me. I also felt that I learned
a lot about the different writing techniques that an author can use to
strengthen a story.
Madison, I thought this was the best blog I read. Also doing my blog on the same story, I realize that we had a lot of the same views on things in the story. The way you talked about the party being a symbol of beauty and confidence as well, was very interesting. It is something I would not have thought of. I also agree with what you said about Mathilde not wanting to wear the necklace if she had known that the necklace was a fake. This was a very good blog post. Good job.
ReplyDeleteMadison, I agree completely that the writer kept you intrigued the whole time. I think you overall explained everything in the same perspective that I would have as well. You were right on with all the major points and the symbols along with their specific meanings. Don’t you think it would have just been so much easier to admit to her wrong doings to start with?
ReplyDelete